A Race Construct by Damon CorrieTweet
White Skin Developed in Europe Only As Recently as 8,000 Years Ago Say Anthropologists
THIS IS SAYING THAT PRIOR TO 8,000 YEARS AGO ‘WHITE SKINNED PEOPLE’- AS A RACE POSSESSING THAT COMMON SKIN COLOUR AS WE KNOW EUROPEANS TODAY – LITERALLY DID NOT EXIST (only people of every other skin color – except for the rare Albino here & there).
Makes the description of them (‘white people’) by wise indigenous elders of other races as óur youngest brothers’ prove to be accurate again…no wonder they know so little of deep spiritual matters…they are the ‘curious children’ of mankind.
Interesting, I always suspected that Caucasoids (as in the 3 main phenotypes formerly recognized of – Negroid, Mongoloid & Caucasoid) were the youngest ‘race’ of human beings (why else would they have only been able to naturally hold such a tiny portion of the Earth for themselves before the advantage of technology turned them into murdering Global land thieves…compared to other skin hues – namely Europe, which is merely the Western peninsula of Asia)…now science (done by some Caucasoid professors) seems to confirm it….they are saying scientifically, that just over 8,000 years ago – literally ‘white people’ did not yet exist……only everyone else (blacks, browns, reds, yellows etc).
It also refutes the very childish notion I see on some Afrocentric sites – that Negroid people gave birth to Caucasoids – ‘who first appeared on Earth as albino Negroids’ (i’ve seen hundreds of albino Negroids, they are never born with Caucasian hair or facial bone structure and features – except for skin color)….it was far more to it than that one generation simplistic unscientific non-explanation.
Already white supremacists are interpreting this data to mean (in their mind) that ‘Caucasoids are the most evolved humans’ (‘newest’ = ‘latest model’)…..in the same manner that Male sexists say that men are more ‘evolved’ than women – because men have the female chromosome PLUS an additional chromosome that women do not….all kinds of ways to interpret data to suit yourself I guess.
Another FACT we should all take note of, that big browed bipedal creature (at far left in the photo based on facial reconstruction techniques) that walked out of Africa all those eons ago did NOT look like any black, brown, or red human being alive today….so when you say ‘the first man was a black man’ you give uneducated people the wrong impression, they have the image of a modern day Bantu looking man when you say that, but the skeletons of ‘Lucy’ and others of that epoch look more like a Chimpanzee than a modern human….no honest human being alive today can claim that the first human being on Earth looked like they themselves do today…though I know these are cherished misconceptions that most people’s ‘ethnic egos’ will find it damn near impossible to accept and admit….it would be more factual if you say the first ‘Bi-pedal Hominid’ or ‘Human-like ancestor’ that existed most likely had black skin…..few can scientifically argue against THAT probability.
This reminds me of something a native holy man once told me which was “white people are like spiritually lost children compared to the rest of humanity, and this is why they abandoned their spiritual connection to the Earth first and found false comfort in acquiring technology instead, and in their confusion they have been so hostile to their spiritually elder brothers who maintain the connection”…I think he has a valid point, we ALL know that every race once lived as tribes (yes even white people), but we also know they were the first ones to turn their back on their tribal identity – and use technology to conquer/eliminate everyone else all over the world…..a people with a deep spiritual connection to mother Earth would NOT behave in this manner.
IMAGINE THAT – EVERY NON-WHITE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH CAN HONESTLY SAY THAt THEIR ANCESTORS WERE WALKING THE EARTH BEFORE WHITE PEOPLE WERE INVENTED
By Damon Corrie